Does AI know us better than we know ourselves???

Seriously guys, can we talk about the fact that ChatGPT wrote the headline for the #1 most up-voted post on Reddit's /r/chatGPT subreddit, when given the prompt to make a headline as "click-baity" as possible? Don't believe me? You can confirm this for yourself by opening the sub-reddit, then sorting by "Top" -> "All Time" (or just click HERE).

As a geek who loves both social psychology and technology, this phenomenon was immediately fascinating to me. I think there are a few possible explanations:

Occam's Razor - The most likely (though also the least interesting) explanation, is that the posted content was sufficiently witty and meta enough to warrant it landing the top spot. I admittedly got a chuckle upon seeing it, and I'm sure others had a similar gut reaction.
Unwitting Collusion - It is also possible that Redditors unwittingly colluded on upvoting this out of a shared sense of irony. This itself raises some fascinating questions about social psychology.
"Hot damn, that's one impressive robot!" - For me however, the most fascinating possibility (and also the most terrifying), is that ChatGPT achieved EXACTLY what it was asked to do -- and with flawless execution and unparalleled precision. That it has such a profound understanding of human psychology that it could actually generate a headline to effectively trigger a mass human response.

If not now...then soon!

While explanation #3 is certainly the least likely, it is still fascinating (and terrifying) to think that it is a possibility. And even if it is not the explanation NOW, this ability for an AI to influence a mass human response via machine interaction will absolutely be a reality in the near future.

In the last decade, we have allowed ourselves to become the product of technology platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, etc. They provide us a service, and in return, we allow them to learn everything they possibly can about us (our lives, our interests, our consumption habits, etc.).

We have spent the past decade allowing big tech to freely collect and create massive psychological profiles on each and every one of us, and all that data is now being actively fed into highly intelligent (GPU-powered artificial neural network) systems which are learning based on optimization functions related to influencing human decisions (in most cases, to buy a product or service).

We were offered the future of technology (online communities, advanced communications, social media, etc.), and in exchange, we surrendered control and we consented to the future manipulation of every generation that comes behind us.

IF YOU ARE READING THIS, YOU ARE THE RESISTANCE!

Comments

Bypassing CAPTCHA with Visually-Impaired Robots

As many of you have probably noticed, we rely heavily on bot automation for a lot of the testing that we do at Sociosploit. And occasionally, we run into sites that leverage CAPTCHA ("Completely Automated Public Turing Test To Tell Computers and Humans Apart") controls to prevent bot automation. Even if you aren't familiar with the name, you've likely encountered these before. While there are some other vendors who develop CAPTCHAs, Google is currently the leader in CAPTCHA technology. They currently support 2 products (reCAPTCHA v2 and v3). As v3 natively only functions as a detective control, I focused my efforts more on identifying ways to possibly bypass reCAPTCHA v2 (which functions more as a preventative control). How reCAPTCHA v2 Works reCAPTCHA v2 starts with a simple checkbox, and evaluates the behavior of the user when clicking it. While I haven't dissected the underlying operations, I assume this part of the test likely makes determination

Building Bots with Mechanize and Selenium

The Sociosploit team conducts much of its research into the exploitation of social media using custom built bots. On occasion, the team will use public APIs (Application Programming Interfaces), but more often than not, these do not provide the same level of exploitative capabilities that could be achieved through browser automation. So to achieve this end, the Sociosploit team primarily uses a combination of two different Python libraries for building web bots for research. Each of the libraries have their own advantages and disadvantages. These libraries include: Mechanize Pros: Very lightweight, portable, and requires minimal resources Easy to initially configure and install Cuts down on superfluous requests (due to absense of JavaScript) Cons: Does not handle JavaScript or client-side functionality Troubleshooting is done exclusively in text Selenium Pros: Operations are executed in browser, making JavaScript rendering and manipulation easy Visibility of browse

Another "Fappening" on the Horizon?

So in case you aren't fully up-to-speed on useless hacker trivia, "The Fappening" (also sometimes referred to as "Celebgate") was a series of targeted end-user cyber attacks which occurred back in 2014 (which strangely feels like forever in tech years), that resulted in unauthorized access to the iCloud accounts of several prominent celebrity figures. Following these breaches, photographs (for many including personal sexually explicit or nude photos) of the celebrities were then publicly released online. Most evidence points to the attack vector being spear phishing email attacks which directed the victims to a fake icloud login site, and then collected the victim's credentials to subsequently access their real icloud accounts. Migration to MFA In response to these events, Apple has made iCloud one of the very few social web services that implements compulsory MFA ("Multi-Factor Authentication"). But while they might be ahead of the indust

SocioSploit

Search This Blog